Writ petition was not pressed by the petitioner and stands disposed of with liberty to pursue remedies before the Revenue Authorities.
Liberty to approach Revenue Authorities or avail available legal remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:9937-DB
1 905-wp 3621.2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 3621 OF 2024
( Jitesh Shamlal Yadav vs. State of Maharashtra and others )
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.
Mr. Ashok Tathod, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.N.P.Mehta, Additional Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 04, 2024
Heard Mr.Tathod, learned Counsel for the petitioner.
( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ) ( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. )
KOLHE
Jitesh Shamlal Yadav
State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
