Disposed

Vijay S/O Madhukar Dhakate v. Joint Commissioner and Vice-Chairman, Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee and Anr.

Bombay HC4 Sept 2024WP/8214/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner appointed against a Scheduled Tribe reserved post sought conversion to a supernumerary post per State policy. Court disposed of the petition directing authorities to decide his claim through employer within four months of representation.

What did the court decide?

Direction to decide representation on supernumerary post conversion within four months.

Vijay S/O Madhukar Dhakate Vs Joint Commissioner and… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:9961-DB

¶2

6--WP-8214-18.odt 1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 8214 of 2018

¶5

Vijay Madhukar Dhakate.

¶6

vs.

¶7

Joint Commissioner & Vice-Chairman, Scheduled Tribe
Caste Certificate Committee,Gadchiroli and anr. and others.

¶8

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's order

¶9

 Mr. S.R.Narnaware, Advocate for petitioner.
 Mr. D. P. Thakre, Additional Government Pleader for respondent no.1.

¶10

CORAM :- NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATE :- 4th SEPTEMBER, 2024

¶11

P. C.

¶12

Heard.

¶13

2.The petitioner, who was appointed against a post reserved for
Scheduled Tribe category, is seeking conversion of his employment
on supernumerary post in view of the policy of the State
Government.

¶14

3.In case such representation is made by the petitioner through
his employer, the respective Authorities shall decide the claim of the
petitioner expeditiously and in any case within a period of four
months from the date of receipt of such representation.

¶15

4.With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No
costs.

¶16

 (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶17

Andurkar.

Vijay S/O Madhukar Dhakate v. Joint Commissioner and Vice-Chairman, Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay S/O Madhukar Dhakate v. Joint Commissioner and Vice-Chairman, Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Jalgaon Education Society, Jalgaon Jamod, Buldhana Thr. Secretary and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Education and Sports Dept., Mumbai and Anr.

Anupkumar S/O Wamanrao Gore Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Public Health Department, Mumbai and Others

Vijay S/O Rajaram Shegokar Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Medical Education and Drugs Department, Mumbai and 4

Nilkanth Mahadev Nandanwar @, Nilkanth Mahadev Gatakhaye Vs Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur through Its Member Secretary and Other

Jitesh Shamlal Yadav and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary, Dept. of Revenue, Mumbai and Ors.

Dr. Ajay Rameshrao Chaware and Others Vs Shri. Sameer Deshmukh, Chairman, Yashwant Rural Education Society, and Ors.