This High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioner for non-prosecution. The court observed that no efforts were made to circulate the petition for admission after October 2013, indicating a lack of interest.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
H. C. Shiv 41.w2275.16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2275 OF 2016
Dipti Vivek Aranha.. Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. S. V. Gavand APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: A. S. GADKARI AND
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATE : 9th FEBRUARY, 2024
P. C.:-
1) Record indicates that, after 13th October 2016, the Advocate for
the Petitioner and/or the Petitioner has not taken any efforts even to
circulate present Petition for admission.
It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing
present Petition.
2) In view thereof, Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK,J.)(A. S. GADKARI, J.)
Digitally signed by HEMANT CHANDERSEN HEMANT SHIV CHANDERSEN SHIV Date: 2024.02.15 05:32:16 +0530
1/1
Dipti Vivek Aranha
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
Shyam C. Chandak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court