Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution. The court observed that despite filing in 2016, the petitioners made no efforts to circulate or pursue the matter by the hearing date.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
H. C. Shiv 30.w1435.16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1435 OF 2016
Imran Abdul Hamid Sayyed & Anr. .. Petitioners
vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. J. P. Yagnik APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: A. S. GADKARI AND
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATE : 9th FEBRUARY, 2024
P. C.:-
1)Record indicates that, since the date of filing of Petition i.e. 21st
March 2016, the Advocate for the Petitioners and/or the Petitioners have not
taken any efforts even to circulate the Petition for admission.
It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing
present Petition.
2) In view thereof, Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK,J.)(A. S. GADKARI, J.)
Digitally signed by HEMANT CHANDERSEN HEMANT SHIV CHANDERSEN SHIV Date: 2024.02.15 05:32:21 +0530
1/1
Imran Abdul Hamid Sayyed & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
A. S. Gadkari
Shyam C. Chandak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court