Petition concerning a criminal investigation was disposed of after the State reported that a charge-sheet had been filed and trial was pending, the petitioner having an alternate statutory remedy before the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
H. C. Shiv 18.w162.16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.162 OF 2016
Dilip Sopanrao Kawale.. Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
Ms. Nikita K. Dharamshi i/b Vikram Chavan for the Petitioner.
Mr. S. V. Gavand APP for the Respondent-State.
Mr. B. G. Bhangare, PSI, Vikramgad Police Station present.
CORAM: A. S. GADKARI AND
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATE : 9th FEBRUARY, 2024
P. C.:-
1)Mr.Gavand, learned APP on instructions submitted that, after
completion of the investigation of present crime the police have submitted
the charge-sheet on 28th October 2017, in the Court of C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C.,
Jawahar, District Palghar and it is numbered as R.C.C.No.140 of 2017. He
further submitted that, the said case is pending for final adjudication.
2)In view thereof the Petitioner is having alternate statutory
remedy under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure before the trial
Court.
3) By reserving the alternative remedy, Petition is disposed off.4) All contentions of both parties are kept open.HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV
Digitally signed by HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date: 2024.02.15 05:32:14 +0530
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK,J.)(A. S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Dilip Sopanrao Kawale
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
Shyam C. Chandak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court