Writ petition seeking reconsideration of an application pending before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in an appeal. By consent, the impugned tribunal order was set aside and the Tribunal directed to decide the application afresh within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 39-2129-24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 2129/2024 Vishnu Shankarrao Gaikwad and others Vs.
Anand S/o Sadashiv Meghe and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. Abhijeet Deshpande, Advocate for petitioners Mr. A.D. Mohagaonkar, Adv. & Mr. A.J. Salway, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 10
Mr. C.A. Lokhande, AGP for Respondents / State
CORAM: N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATED : 14th JUNE, 2024
By consent of the parties, the order impugned dated 13/15.02.2024, passed by the leaned Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Nagpur below Exh.22 in appeal No.41/2022, is hereby set aside. The Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal shall decide the application at Exh.22 afresh within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
Signed by: Mr. M.P. Deshpande MP Deshpande Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 15/06/2024 11:35:03
Vishnu Shankarrao Gaikwad and others
Anand S/o Sadashiv Meghe and others
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
