Petition challenged a Divisional Commissioner's order disqualifying the petitioner as Gram Panchayat member on encroachment grounds under Section 14(1)(j-3). The court found the Commissioner's findings not perverse and declined interference, dismissing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:6035
19-wp-2154-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2154 OF 2024
Ms Ayushi Dangre for the Petitioner. Ms Prachi Joshi for the Respondent/State. Mr. M.V. Rai for Respondent No.5.
CORAM : N. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 13 JUNE 2024.
PC:-
1/2
Dinesh S. Sherla
19-wp-2154-24.doc
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
2/2
Dinesh S. Sherla
Signed by: DINESH SHERLA Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 13/06/2024 17:54:17
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's alleged encroachment on government land attracted disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.
Whether the Divisional Commissioner's order disqualifying the petitioner warranted interference.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sau. Kanchan w/o. Arvind Kadav
Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur
Additional District Collector, Bhandara
Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Tadgaon
Talathi – Dhop, Gram Panchayat, Tadgaon
Shravan s/o. Sitaram Doye
N. R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
