Petitioner sought approval of his appointment. The State's counsel undertook that the proposal for grant of approval to the appointment would be decided within six weeks; accepting this statement, the Division Bench disposed of the writ petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP1941-24.odt
2024:BHC-NAG:3538-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 1941/2024
(DINESH HANUMAN KAPTE VERSUS EDUCATION OFFICER (SECONDARY), ZILLA PARISHAD, CHANDRAPUR & OTHERS)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.
Shri M.B. Turankar, counsel for the petitioner.
Shri M.K. Pathan, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent-State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
D ATE : MARCH 21, 2024
Heard the learned counsel for the parties for some time. Shri M.K. Pathan, learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the proposal with regard to the grant of approval to the appointment of the petitioner shall be decided within a period of six weeks.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
APTE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State would decide the petitioner's proposal for approval of his appointment within a fixed time.
Dinesh Hanuman Kapte
Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Chandrapur
NITIN W. SAMBRE
ABHAY J. MANTRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
