Writ petition disposed of as not pressed after respondent no. 4 paid compensation to the petitioner, who stated on instructions that he did not wish to proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:3503-DB
907-WP-1870-2024.odt 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1870 of 2024
Shaikh Zameer Shaikh Ganibai
vs.
The District Magistrate and Collector, Washim and others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Shri N. B. Kalwaghe, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri N.S.Rao, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos. 1 and 2.. Shri D.M.Kale, Advocate for respondent no.3.
Shri A.A.Kathane, Advocate for respondent no.4
CORAM :- NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE :- 21st MARCH, 2024.
Mr. Kathane, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.4 submitted that the respondent no.4 has paid compensation to the petitioner, the said statement is accepted by Mr. Kalwaghe, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Andurkar.
Shaikh Zameer Shaikh Ganibai
The District Magistrate and Collector, Washim
Respondent no. 2
Respondent no. 3
Respondent no. 4
Nitin W. Sambre
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
