Interim order in a writ petition concerning a monetary deposit; counsel sought to demonstrate compliance with an undertaking regarding a difference of Rs.2,19,000 between the possession receipt figure and the deposited amount, failing which the interim order would be vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6-WP-1758-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1758 OF 2024
Pandit Vasntrao Ingole ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Thr. The District Collector & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Dipak Shinde, for the Petitioner.
Adv. Sushant Prabhune i/by Adv. Mamta Pandey, for the Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J. DATE : 9th JULY 2024
P.C.:
TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO
Digitally signed by TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Date: 2024.07.10 19:31:43 +0530
1 of 2
Shubham Talle
6-WP-1758-2024.doc
(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
2 of 2
Shubham Talle
Pandit Vasntrao Ingole
The State of Maharashtra Thr. The District Collector
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
