The High Court of Bombay dismissed the second appeal by relying on a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) entered into between the appellant and the respondent. Holding that no substantive issues survived the MoU, the court disposed of the appeal and incidental applications.
Second appeal and incidental applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8 Sa-668-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 668 OF 2017
Abidhussein Mohmmad Ansari. Versus
...Appellant.
Nasim Ahmad Jalil Momin. ...Respondent.
Mr. Sameer Mhatre i/b Mr. Amol Mhatre for the appellant.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : February 13, 2024.
P. C. :
1. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant tenders a copy of the MoU entered into between the appellant and the respondent. The same is taken on record. He submits that second appeal can be disposed of in terms of the MoU.
2. In view of the MoU entered into between parties, nothing survives for consideration in the second appeal. Second appeal is disposed of.
3. In view of the disposal of second appeal, civil/interim application(s) taken out in this appeal, if any, does not survive and the same is disposed of.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
1 of 1
Patil-SR
Signed by: Sachin R. Patil Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 14/02/2024 15:34:26
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal requires adjudication when a Memorandum of Understanding between the parties is available.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Abidhussein Mohmmad Ansari
Nasim Ahmad Jalil Momin
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court