Ratnaprabha Prabhakar Kardile and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A bare adjournment order by consent: the writ petition was stood over to the next date and any ad-interim relief previously granted was directed to continue till then. It decides no issue of law.
What the court decided
sns 45-aswp-16614-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.16614 OF 2024
Ratnaprabha Prabhakar Kardile & Ors. … Petitioners.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents.
Mr. Ramesh Ramamurthy a/w. Adv. Nitin Jagtap for the Petitioners. Mr. Mandar Limaye for Respondent No.2 Mr. Sachin Pawar h/f. Adv. Satyajeet Dighe for Respondent No.3. Mr. Rohit Joshi for Respondent No.4. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 4th December 2024.
P.C.:-
- By consent of learned Advocaes for the parties, stand over to 9th
December, 2024.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ratnaprabha Prabhakar Kardile & Ors.
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
A. S. Gadkari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Jairam Damji Hingu vs the State of Maharashtra
Big Tree Entertainment Private Limited vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Department of Revenue
Godavari Urban Multistate Credit Cooperative Society Limited vs State of Maharashtra
Jyoti Builders vs the Chief Executive Officer , the Slum Rehabilitation Authority