Writ petition filed by the Union of India in 2009 was called on but no one appeared for the petitioners. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution, later confirmed as dismissal for want of instructions when an advocate stated he had no instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed LAXMIKANT by LAXMIKANT GOPAL GOPAL CHANDAN CHANDAN Date: 2024.02.15 17:29:04 +0530
1 (20) WP-157.09-a.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.157 OF 2009
Union of India and ors. : Petitioners. Vs.
Hari Om Shrivastava : Respondent.
None for the Petitioners.
Ms. Ashmita Pendharkar i/by Mr. Rahul Walia for the Respondent.
CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 14th FEBRUARY, 2024
P.C. :
following order :-
“This petition is filed by the Union of India through a Law Firm in the year 2008. None appears for the Petitioners. None had appeared for the Petitioners in the year 2015 as well. It is not clear as to whether this Law Firm still continues to represent the Petitioner – Union of India through the Department of Revenue.
1 of 2
LGC
2 (20) WP-157.09-a.doc
advocates. Notice is made returnable on 14
February 2024.”
Petitioner No.4 has been served.
behalf of the Petitioners.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
2 of 2
LGC
Union of India and ors.
Hari Om Shrivastava
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
