Public interest litigation called on for hearing; no one appeared for the petitioners. The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed LAXMIKANT by LAXMIKANT GOPAL GOPAL CHANDAN CHANDAN Date: 2024.02.15 13:55:10 +0530
1 (22) PIL-48.20.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.48 OF 2020
Forum For Fast Justice through its Secretary Ashish Mehta and Anr. : Petitioners.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra and ors. : Respondents.
None for the Petitioners. Ms. P. H. Kantharia – GP, for the Respondents-State.
CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 14th FEBRUARY, 2024
P.C. :
of the Petitioners.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
1 of 1
LGC
Forum For Fast Justice through its Secretary Ashish Mehta
State of Maharashtra and ors.
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
