Tushar Janardan Kawale Thru His Ca Shrutika S Parab v. Competent Authority -4 and Land Manager Mumbai Board (Bandra Division)

Bombay HC19 Nov 2024WP/1492/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Four writ petitions concerning appellate proceedings before the Additional Collector (E and R). The court noted the appeal is scheduled for hearing on 28 August 2024, declined to pass further orders, and extended the interim relief already granted until the next date.

What did the court decide?

Interim relief granted earlier extended till next date of hearing.

Tushar Janardan Kawale Thru His Ca Shrutika S Parab vs Competent Authority -4 and Land Manager Mumbai Board (Bandra Division) — Bombay HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

41-WP-1489-2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 1489 OF 2024

¶5

Laxman Balaram Salvi Since Decd Thr. Lrs Nanda Laxman Salvi

¶6

…. Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The Additional Collector ( E And R ) Western Sub. And Appellate Authority Court And Ors

¶9

…. Respondents

¶10

WITH

¶11

WRIT PETITION NO. 1491 OF 2024

¶12

Bhargav Sadashiv Redkar T. Hr. C.A. …. Petitioner Nilesh S Sawant

¶13

Versus

¶14

The Additional Collector ( E And R ) (Western Suburban) And Appellate Authority Court And Ors.

¶15

…. Respondents

¶16

WITH

¶17

WRIT PETITION NO. 1490 OF 2024

¶18

Jayshree Rajaram Kuvlekar …. Petitioner Thr. CA Sanjay Manohar Sawant

¶19

Versus

¶20

The Additional Collector ( E And R ) (Western Suburban) And Appellate Authority Court And Ors.

¶21

…. Respondents

¶22

Shantanu Dhudum 1/3

¶23

41-WP-1489-2024.doc

¶24

WITH

¶25

WRIT PETITION NO. 1492 OF 2024

¶26

Tushar Janardan Kawale Through. His …. Petitioner CA Shrutika S. Parab.

¶27

Versus

¶28

Competent Authority-4 And Land …. Respondent manager Mumbai Board (Bandra Division)

¶29

Adv. Munil Punjabi i/b Ms. Priya Pandey, Advocate for the Petitioner in all matters.

¶30

Ms. Snehal Jadhav, AGP, for the State.

¶31

Mr. Abhijit Patil i/b Mr. Vijay Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.4 in WP/1490/2024.

¶32

Mr. Krushna Jaybhay i/b Adv. A. P. Kulkarni, Advocate for SRA in WP/1491/2024.

¶33

Mr. R. S. Mishra, Advocate for Respondent No.6 in all matters. Ms. Deepti Thorat a/w Adv. J. G. Reddy, Advocate for Respondent No.4 in SRA in WP/1489/2024 & WP/1491/2024.

¶34

CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.

¶35

DATE : 26^th AUGUST, 2024.

¶36

P.C. :

¶37

Now there is no dispute about the facts that the

¶38

proceeding before the Appellate Authority is scheduled for hearing on 28^th August, 2024.

¶39

Having regard to the said fact this Court not inclined to pass any further order.

¶40

Shantanu Dhudum 2/3

¶41

41-WP-1489-2024.doc

¶42

Interim relief granted by this Court stands extended till

¶43

next date of hearing.

¶44

Stand over to 4^th September, 2024.

¶45

( R. M. JOSHI, J.)

¶46

Shantanu Dhudum 3/3

Tushar Janardan Kawale Thru His Ca Shrutika S Parab v. Competent Authority -4 and Land Manager Mumbai Board (Bandra Division)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tushar Janardan Kawale Thru His Ca Shrutika S Parab v. Competent Authority -4 and Land Manager Mumbai Board (Bandra Division)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Krantikari Kamgar Union vs Kuoni Travel (I)Pvt.Ltd.

Trig Detective Pvt. Ltd. vs Ramnaresh Verma

Hdfc Bank Ltd. vs the Dy Commissioner of Labour Kamgar Bhavan

Idbi Bank Ltd. and Another vs Icici Bank Ltd. and 4 Others

Mahendra Realtors and Infrastructure Private Limited vs the Managing Director, Maharashtra Fisheries Development Corporation Limited

Jawed Habib Hair and Beauty Limited vs Max-Link