Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared on two occasions despite adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:290-DB
(1) wp1465.2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.1465/2020
Mangesh Ashokrao Mallewar Vs. State of Maharashtra & another
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. V. S.Kukday, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. A.A.Madiwale, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATED : 09/01/2024.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Ambulkar
Mangesh Ashokrao Mallewar
State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
