Disposed

Ku. Daya D/O Ravindra Wardekar v. Sceduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Thr. Its Deputy Director and Member Secretary

Bombay HC8 Jan 2024WP/3121/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court recorded that the petitioner's claim for Scheduled Tribe status was pending before the respondent Committee. The Court directed the petitioner to appear on 29.01.2024 with written notes, requiring the Committee to afford an opportunity and decide the claim by 31.03.2024.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent Committee to hear the petitioner on 29.01.2024 and decide the claim by 31.03.2024.

Ku. Daya D/O Ravindra Wardekar Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 WP-3121-2022.odt

¶2

2024:BHC-NAG:229-DB

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

Writ Petition No.3121 of 2022

¶5

Ku. Daya D/o Ravindra Wardekar

¶6

Versus

¶7

Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order
and Registrar's orders.

¶9

Shri A.D. Girdekar, Counsel for Petitioner.

¶10

Shri Hrishikesh Marathe, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent.

¶11

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.

¶12

DATE : 8th JANUARY,2024 .

¶13

1. The petitioner claims to belong to ‘Thakur’, Scheduled Tribe. We are informed that the petitioner’s real brother holds a validity certificate. The respondent-Committee is informed to have already heard the matter of the petitioner, however the order is awaited.

¶14

2.The learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent-Committee
submits that the claim of the petitioner shall be decided by the Committee within
a period of six months.

¶15

3.Be that as it may, we direct the petitioner to appear before the respondent-
Committee with his written notes of arguments on 29-1-2024. The Committee
shall thereafter afford an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and decide
the claim by 31-3-2024.

¶16

4. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶17

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶18

LANJEWAR

Ku. Daya D/O Ravindra Wardekar v. Sceduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Thr. Its Deputy Director and Member Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ku. Daya D/O Ravindra Wardekar v. Sceduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Thr. Its Deputy Director and Member Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maharashtra Shikshan Sanstha, Kalmeshwar, Nagpur Thr. President Ashok S/O Shankarrao Dharmik Vs State of Maha. through Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mumbai and Others

Anil S/O Madhukar Dhait Vs Zilla Parishad, Chandrapur through Chief Executive Officer and Others

Mrs. Ranjani Chandrasekharan Vs the Union of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Financial Services, New Delhi and Others

New Adarsha Shikshan Sanstha, Pulgaon, Wardha Thr. Secy., Rajkumar Lasmanrao Dudhe Vs State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Dept. of School, Mumbai and Ors.

Rajendra Vishwanath Moon Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of School Education and Sports, Mumbai and Ors.

Dnyneshwar Umaji Bele Vs Chief G. M., (Human Resources), Maha. State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd., Mumbai and Ors.