Disposed

Rajendra Vishwanath Moon v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of School Education and Sports, Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC8 Jan 2024CAW/968/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, a former part-time Junior College Lecturer, seeks counting of half his part-time service as full-time for retiral benefits, citing an earlier Division Bench judgment. The court allowed leave to amend the prayer clause and issued notice returnable on 20 February 2024.

What did the court decide?

Leave to amend prayer clause (year 2099 corrected to 1999); notice issued to respondents, returnable on 20.02.2024.

Rajendra Vishwanath Moon Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:228-DB

¶2

(1) 36wp1603.2020

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

Civil Application (CAW)No.968/2021 & WRIT PETITION NO.1603/2020

¶5

Rajendra Vishwanath Moon Vs. The State of Maharashtra & others

¶6

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶7

Dr. B.G.Kulkarni, Advocate for petitioner.

¶8

Ms. Deepali Sapkal, AGP for the respondent nos.1 to 3.

¶9

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATED : 08/01/2024.

¶10

Heard.

¶11

Leave to amend the prayer clause so as to correct the year from “2099” to “1999” is allowed. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

¶12

The case of the petitioner is that from 22^nd July, 1999 to 30^th June, 2007 he was working as part time Junior College Lecturer and his services were completed that of full time Junior College Lecturer subsequent thereto.

¶13

He would claim that half of the aforesaid service period of 8 years and 10 days is required to be considered as full time employment for the purpose of calculation of retiral benefits and the same is considered to be extended financial benefits to the petitioner. Dr. Kulkarni, Counsel for the petitioner would invite our attention to the judgment dated 17^th February, 2020 delivered in Writ Petition No. 8656 of 2018 ( Surekha wd/o Vinayak Kathardekar (Ratriade) Vs. Joint Director Higher Education and others ). As such, he claims that the issue is squarely covered by the aforesaid judgment.

¶14

He would also invite our attention to the Civil Application (CAW) No.968/2021 wherein he would claim that similarly placed persons are also granted benefits based on the judgments and administrative instructions to the respondent-authorities.

¶15

(2) 36wp1603.2020

¶16

In view thereof, issue notice to the respondents returnable on 20^th February, 2024.

¶17

Ms. Deepali Sapkal, learned AGP waives notice for respondent

¶18

nos.1 to 3.

¶19

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶20

Ambulkar

Rajendra Vishwanath Moon v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of School Education and Sports, Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Vishwanath Moon v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of School Education and Sports, Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maharashtra Shikshan Sanstha, Kalmeshwar, Nagpur Thr. President Ashok S/O Shankarrao Dharmik Vs State of Maha. through Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mumbai and Others

Anil S/O Madhukar Dhait Vs Zilla Parishad, Chandrapur through Chief Executive Officer and Others

Mrs. Ranjani Chandrasekharan Vs the Union of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Financial Services, New Delhi and Others

Ku. Daya D/O Ravindra Wardekar Vs Sceduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Thr. Its Deputy Director and Member Secretary

New Adarsha Shikshan Sanstha, Pulgaon, Wardha Thr. Secy., Rajkumar Lasmanrao Dudhe Vs State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Dept. of School, Mumbai and Ors.

Dnyneshwar Umaji Bele Vs Chief G. M., (Human Resources), Maha. State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd., Mumbai and Ors.