Maithili Balkrishna Ghanekar v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order in a writ petition; counsel sought two weeks' time due to the petitioner's advocate on record being in personal difficulty. The court stood the matter over to 27 November 2024, deciding nothing on merits.
What the court decided
Digitally signed by MULEY MULEY SHUBHAM SHUBHAM PRAVINRAO PRAVINRAO Date: 2024.11.14 14:42:22 +0530
1 13-WP-1457-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1457 OF 2024
Maithili Balkrishna Ghanekar
...Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Respondents
Ms. Shubhangi Chorge i/by Raviraj Gamare for the Petitioner. Mr. A. R. Metkari, APP for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 13TH NOVEMBER, 2024
P.C.:-
- Ms. Chorge appeared today and submitted that the Advocate on
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Maithili Balkrishna Ghanekar
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
Arif S. Doctor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court