The High Court of Bombay Criminal Appeals held that a writ petition challenging domestic violence proceedings was infructuous as the main civil proceedings had been completed, and accordingly disposed of the matter as such.
The petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-WP-5624-2018.DOC
2024:BHC-AS:45092
Gaikwad RD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5624 OF 2018
Mukund Narayan Gadkari & Ors. …Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents
Mr. Vishwatej Jadhav, i/b. Mr. Mangesh D. Nalavade, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Ajay Patil, APP, for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM Dr. Neela Gokhale, J. DATED: 26th November 2024
PC:-
(Dr. Neela Gokhale, J)
Page 1 of 1 26th November 2024
Signed by: Raju D. Gaikwad Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 27/11/2024 11:49:30
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition is infructuous since the main domestic violence proceeding is completed.
Mukund Narayan Gadkari & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
