Hiraman Laxman Mazire Thr. Poa Gangaram H. Mazire vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Ministry of Revenue and Forest and Ors.

1. Petition has been moved urgently in view of directions which were given to the Circle Officer to remove the impediment on 18^th October, 2024. This Court therefore inquired with the learned AGP whether the coercive action can be stayed till the Petition is being heard.

¶12

2. The matter was kept back for taking necessary instructions.

¶13

3. Learned AGP, subsequently, informed that a communication was addressed by the Tahsildar Mulshi. The Communication is taken on record. Perusal of the communication indicates that the Tahsildar has stayed the removal of the impediment on the road for the reason that this Court has granted stay order. It is clarified that there is no formal stay and the only inquiry by this Court was whether it is possible to

¶14

1 of 2

¶15

Harish

¶16

901-WP-14474-2024.doc

¶17

possible to postpone the proceedings till the matter is heard by this Court.

¶18

4. With this clarification the communication is taken as a statement by the Tahsildar that till the next date, no coercive action will be taken as indicated in the direction dated 1^st October, 2024.

¶19

5. List the Petitioner for further consideration on 25^th November, 2024 .

¶20

6. Till the next date, the statement of the Tahsildar that no action will be taken to continue.

¶21

[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]

¶22

2 of 2

¶23

Harish

¶24

Signed by: Harish V. Chaudhari Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 19/10/2024 16:21:09

Hiraman Laxman Mazire Thr. Poa Gangaram H. Mazire v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Ministry of Revenue and Forest and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hiraman Laxman Mazire Thr. Poa Gangaram H. Mazire v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Ministry of Revenue and Forest and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Darshan Bharat Dalal vs Star Grain and Shipping Private Limited and 11 Others

M S Industries a Partenership Firm vs Btali International through Its Sole Propriter Murtuza Bhopalwala

Akshay Kachru Ahire vs the State of Maharashtra

Nadeem Majid Oomerbhoy vs 1(A) Riyad Rashid Oomerbhoy and Ors.

Arti Harish Tak @ Aarti Taak vs State of Maharashtra

Navnath Madhukar Gade vs the State of Maharashtra