Adjournment order in a writ petition; matter stood over to 05/03/2025 due to paucity of time, with any interim order continuing till then.
This is a bare adjournment order: the Bombay High Court, for want of time, stood over Writ Petition No. 14329 of 2024 to 05 March 2025 and directed that any interim order then operating would continue till that date. It decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 14329 OF 2024
Sampada Suresh Katekar Alias Narmada Vithoba....PETITIONER Takur
V/S
Sushila Ramakant Alias Sushila Vithoba Thakur....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK J DATE : 16th December, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 05/03/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Sampada Suresh Katekar Alias Narmada Vithoba Takur
Sushila Ramakant Alias Sushila Vithoba Thakur
S. M. Modak
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
