Disposed

Manoj Shrinivas Gupta v. Shashi Keshavchandra Dwivedi

Bombay HC10 Apr 2024IA/1064/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim application in a testamentary suit seeking transposition of a beneficiary as plaintiff in place of the aged original executor-petitioner unable to prosecute the probate petition. The court allowed prosecution of the petition subject to its conversion into one for Letters of Administration with the Will annexed.

What did the court decide?

Applicant permitted to prosecute the petition upon amendment converting it into one for Letters of Administration with the Will annexed within three weeks; amended copy to be served on caveator.

Manoj Shrinivas Gupta vs Shashi Keshavchandra… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-OS:17104

¶2

29 ia 1064 of 2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1064 OF 2024 IN

¶3

TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.72 OF 2017 IN

¶4

PETITION NO.802 OF 2014

¶5

Manoj Shrinivas Gupta … Applicant and Dinesh Chand Gupta … Petitioner/Plaintiff versus versus Shashi Keshavchandra Dwivedi … Defendant

¶6

Mr. Shilpan Gaonkar i/by Mr. N.R.Gandhi, for Applicant/Plaintiff. Mr. Omprakash Pandey with Ms. Suchita Pandey, for Defendant.

¶7

CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J.

¶8

DATE : 18 OCTOBER 2024

¶9

P.C.

¶10

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

¶11

This application is preferred seeking permission to transpose the applicant as the Plaintiff in the place and instead of Dinesh Chand Gupta, the original Petitioner and executor, who has filed the Petition for Probate of the last Will and Testament of Shrinivas Radheshyam Gupta (deceased).

¶12

In the application, it is averred that, in the Will, the deceased had named three executors. Altaf Ali, one of the Executors has expired. Mangal S. Gupta renounced the executorship by a letter dated 20 March 2014. Dinesh Chand Gupta, another executor, the original petitioner, filed the instant petition No.802 of 2014 for the grant of Probate. Upon the caveat being filed,

¶13

SSP 1/3

¶14

29 ia 1064 of 2024.doc the Petition stood converted into instant TS No.72 of 2017. Dinesh Gupta, the original Petitioner/executor, who is a resident of Hathras, Uttar Pradesh, is of an advanced age. He is not in a position to appear before this Court and prosecute the Petition. He has filed an affidavit dated 6 March 2018 showing his inability to prosecute the Petition. It is, therefore, necessary to amend the Petition and permit the applicant to prosecute the Petition.

¶15

The Defendant/caveator has resisted the application.

¶16

Learned Counsel for the Defendant submitted that there is no justifiable ground for seeking transposition of the applicant as a Plaintiff. Under Section 222 of the Indian Succession Act, Probate can be granted only to an executor.

¶17

I have perused the averments in the application and the reply thereto. The applicant is stated to be one of the beneficiaries under the Will. One of the named executor has passed away. Another has renounced the executorship. Though the third executor has filed the Petition for grant of Probate, yet the original Petitioner has also expressed his inability to prosecute the Petition. The affidavit dated 6 March 2018 (Exhibit B) sworn by Dinesh Gupta, the Petitioner, is annexed to the Petition.

¶18

From the perusal of the said affidavit, it becomes evident that Dinesh Gupta, desires to renounce the executorship. It is trite, the office of the executor is voluntary and one cannot be compelled to prosecute the Petition. I am, therefore, inclined to allow the applicant to prosecute the Petition.

¶19

SSP 2/3

¶20

29 ia 1064 of 2024.doc However, since the applicant is not an executor named under the Will, the Petition will be required to be converted into one for Letters of Administration with the Will annexed. Hence, the following order :

¶21

ORDER

¶22

(i) The applicant is permitted to prosecute the Petition. However, the applicant shall carry out necessary amendment in the Petition so as to convert the Petition into one for Letters of Administration with the Will annexed.

¶23

(ii) Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of three

¶24

weeks.

¶25

(iii) Amended copy of the Petition be served on the Caveator/Defendant.

¶26

(iv) The Caveator/Defendant is at liberty to file additional affidavit raising appropriate grounds, post conversion of the Petition into one for Letters of Administration.

¶27

(v) Interim Application stands disposed.

¶28

( N.J.JAMADAR, J. )

¶29

SSP 3/3

¶30

Signed by: S.S.Phadke Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 21/10/2024 14:58:24

Manoj Shrinivas Gupta v. Shashi Keshavchandra Dwivedi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Shrinivas Gupta v. Shashi Keshavchandra Dwivedi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Neeta Dattu Alhat - Applicant vs Anita Dattu Alhat - Deceased

Ashirwad Nice Developers vs Snehalata Ganpat Dalvi and Ors.

Pritam Chandulal Oswal vs State of Maharashtra

Abdul Rehman Shaikh Vs Executive Engineer 'C-1' Division M.B.R and R and 3 Ors.

Sameer Taj Khan Vs State of Maharashtra

Sachin Gautam Dhurandar Vs State of Maharashtra