Vinay G. Patil v. the State of Maharashtra through Urban Development Dept and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition was stood over to a future date at the request of the petitioner's counsel, with a restriction that the petitioner or his advocate not circulate the petition before the returnable date.
What the court decided
RVC 37 Wp-13805-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 13805 OF 2024
Mr. Vinay G. Patil
… Petitioner
V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Ms. Vishakha Shelar h/f Mr. Suryajeet Chavan for Petitioner. Ms. M.P. Thakur, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. S.V. Gavand for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 9th October 2024.
P.C. :
- At the request of learned counsel for the Petitioner, stand over to
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mr. Vinay G. Patil
- respondent
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Coram
A. S. Gadkari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court