Jahangir Ardeshir Rabadi v. Mr. Sikandar Kachwalla and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging standard rent fixed by Trial Court was disposed of as withdrawn by the High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-wp13642-18.doc
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by VASANT VASANT ANANDRAO ANANDRAO IDHOL IDHOL Date: WRIT PETITION NO.13642 OF 2018 2024.03.20 10:31:20 +0530
Jehangir A. Rabadi ...Petitioner V/s. Sikandar M. Kachwala & Anr. ...Respondents
Ms.Nikita Mandaniyan with Adv.Arya Sapre for the Petitioner. Mr.A.Z. Mookhtiar with Mr.Bhushan for the Respondents.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 5TH MARCH, 2024.
P.C. :-
dated 11 April 2018, thereby challenging the quantum of the standard rent fixed by the Trial Court.
of Rs.620/- per month for the flat admeasuring 800 sq.ft,
1/2
904-wp13642-18.doc
situated at Grant Road, Mumbai in South Mumbai, which
according to me is less then even one rupee. The Petitioner submits that the rent should be Rs.126/- per month for the area admeasuring 800 sq. ft.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
2/2
Jehangir A. Rabadi
Sikandar M. Kachwala
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court