Virama Laminate Pvt. Ltd. v. Anthony Garage Pvt. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition disposed of as not pressed after counsel reported the parties had settled the matter and did not wish to pursue it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/1
40 - WP 12696 OF 2023.doc
KANCHAN Digitally signed byKANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2024.03.0719:16:27 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 12696 OF 2023
Virama Laminate Private Ltd.
….. Petitioner
VERSUS
Anthony Garage Pvt. Ltd.
….. Respondent
Mr. Roshan H. Yadav i/b. Mr.Rajesh Talekar for the Petitioner.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 4 MARCH, 2024
P.C. :-
Mr. Yadav, learned counsel holding for Mr.Talekar for the
petitioner submits that he has instructions that the parties have
settled the matter amongst themselves. Therefore, they do not
wish to pursue this writ petition.
2. Writ petition is disposed of as not pressed.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
Virama Laminate Private Ltd.
Anthony Garage Pvt. Ltd.
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court