Allowed

Maruti Sitaram Acharekar, Thru. Poa Sou. Pooja Ganesh Acharekar v. Dilip Chandrakant Shinde

Bombay HC4 Mar 2024CAC/362/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant sought quashing of a conditional order directing removal of office objections in a civil revision application within three weeks, failing which it would be rejected. Objections were not removed and the revision application stood dismissed. The court found the case made out and allowed the application.

What the court decided

AI extract

Maruti Sitaram Acharekar, Thru. Poa Sou. Pooja… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

6 - CAC 362 OF 2018.doc

¶2

KVM

¶3

1/2

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶5

KANCHAN Digitally signed byKANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2024.03.0614:58:23 +0530

¶6

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶7

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.362 OF 2018

¶8

IN

¶9

REJECTED CASE NO.1383 OF 2017

¶10

Maruti Sitaram Acharkar, Thr. POA Pooja Ganesh Acharekar

¶11

….. Applicant

¶12

VERSUS

¶13

Dilip Chandrakant Shinde

¶14

….. Respondent

¶15

Mr. Sushil Inamdar for the Applicant.

¶16

Mr.S.C.Mangle for the Respondent.

¶17

CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

¶18

 DATE : 4 MARCH, 2024

¶19

P.C. :-

¶20

This civil application is filed for quashing and setting aside

¶21

the conditional order dated 28 June, 2017 passed by the
Registrar (Judicial-II). By the impugned order dated 28 June,
2017, three weeks time was granted to remove office objections,
failing which this civil revision application was supposed to be
rejected.

¶22

KVM

¶23

2/2

¶24

6 - CAC 362 OF 2018.doc

¶25

2. Since office objections were not removed within the

¶26

stipulated time, the civil revision application automatically stood
dismissed.

¶27

3. This Court by its order dated 7 November, 2023 had issued

¶28

notice to the respondent.

¶29

4. Mr. Mangle, learned counsel appears for the sole

¶30

respondent. He is objecting to allow this civil application.

¶31

5. Heard. I have gone through the contents of the civil

¶32

application. The case is made out to allow this civil application.

¶33

6. Civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).

¶34

7. Civil application is disposed of accordingly.

¶35

[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]

Maruti Sitaram Acharekar, Thru. Poa Sou. Pooja Ganesh Acharekar v. Dilip Chandrakant Shinde

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Maruti Sitaram Acharekar, Thru. Poa Sou. Pooja Ganesh Acharekar v. Dilip Chandrakant Shinde

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs. Chitra Amol Patil Vs Mrs. Amol Alias Devendra Ravindra Patil

Mr. Santosh Sabaji Malkar Vs Mrs. Sarika Santosh Malkar

Neha Sumeet Bal Vs Sumeet Shrikant Bal

Virama Laminate Pvt. Ltd. Vs Anthony Garage Pvt. Ltd.

Maruti Sitaram Acharrekar, Thr. Lrs. Ganesh Maruti Acharekar Vs Dilip Chandrakant Shinde

Mangalaben Narayandas Thakkar (Deceased) Thr. Lrs. Smt. Hansaben Jayantilal Thakkar Vs Dilipkumar Pranjeevan Thakkar