Vijayay Adyanthaya v. Balasaheb S. Muluk and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order in a writ petition; leave granted to file additional pleadings and the matter was stood over to 09 January 2025 at counsel's request. No substantive issue decided.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27-WP-13535-2024.DOCX
Darshan Patil
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 13535 OF 2024 Vijayay Adyanthaya …Petitioner Versus Babasaheb S Muluk and Ors. …Respondents ______________________________________________________
Ms Rishika Agarwal , i/b Ms Niranjani Shetty, for the Petitioner.
Mr Manish Kelkar , for Respondent No.3.
Mr Yogesh Patil , for Respondent No.4.
Ms S D Vyas , Addl. GP a/w Adv N M Mehra, AGP, for the Respondent-State. ______________________________________________________ CORAM: M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ. DATED: 28 November 2024
PC:-
- Leave is granted to file additional pleadings.
- At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, stand over to 09 January 2025.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vijayay Adyanthaya
- respondent
Babasaheb S Muluk
- respondent
Respondent No.3
- respondent
Respondent No.4
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Tata Motors Ltd. vs Bhagyodaya Trokhos Pvt. Ltd.
Mumbai Shahar Berojgar Seva Sahakari Sanstha Federation Limited vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Mcgm)
Borivali Himkanya Chs Ltd. vs Divisional Joint Registrar and 3 Others
Ansari Erectors vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Mission Director State Water and Sanitation and Ors.