Tata Motors Ltd. v. Bhagyodaya Trokhos Pvt. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court adjourned the matter for two weeks to allow the parties to pursue settlement, with the matter to be heard under the caption of settlement.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/1
13 - CARAP 17 OF 2024.doc
Digitally signed by KANCHAN KANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2024.07.25 18:57:52 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 17 OF 2024
Tata Motors Ltd. ….. Applicant
VERSUS
Bhagyodaya Trokhos Pvt. Ltd.
….. Respondent
None for the Applicant.
Mr.Ativ Patel i/b. AVP Partners for the Respondent.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Tata Motors Ltd.
- respondent
Bhagyodaya Trokhos Pvt. Ltd.
Coram
RAJESH S. PATIL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
20 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Anuradha Jitendra Singh Chaudhary vs State of Maharashtra Thr Government Pleader and Ors.
Mahalaxmi Automotives Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra Thr Its Prin. Secretary, Rural Dept. and Ors.
Moreshwar Mahila Prathmik Grahak Sahakari Sastha Ltd. Throu.Its Manager Madhukar S Shelke vs the State of Maharashtra Throu. Its Sec. Medical Education and Drugs Dept and Ors.
Wohr Parking Systems Private Limited vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai