Disposed
Rajiv Chandrakant Jhaveri and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCWP/1338/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Leave and liberty granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:28811-DB
rdg 3-wp-1338-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1338 OF 2024
Rajiv Chandrakant Jhaveri & Ors. …..Petitioners Vs.
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents
Ms. Bina Jariwala, i/b. Auroma Law, for the Petitioners. Mr. Vinod Chate APP, for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
DR NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 16th JULY, 2024.
P.C.:-
inadvertently the informant has also been impleaded as Petitioner instead of Respondent No.3 and therefore contemporaneous pleadings are incorporated in the present Petition. She therefore seeks leave to withdraw Petition with liberty to file fresh Writ Petition for same cause of action, by impleading the necessary parties as Petitioners and Respondents.
(DR NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Signed by: Raju D. Gaikwad Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 23/07/2024 12:22:03
Rajiv Chandrakant Jhaveri & Ors.
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr.
A. S. Gadkari
Dr. Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court