Allowed

Janata Raja Bahuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Throu. President Ganesh D Neel and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra Throu. Its Sec. Dept of School Education and Sports and Ors.

Bombay HC29 Aug 2024WP/11789/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, educational institutions sought reimbursement of grants under Section 12(2) of the RTE Act, 2009. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay directed respondent authorities to consider the entitlement and complete the process within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider entitlement for reimbursement of grants under Section 12(2) of RTE Act, 2009 within three months.

Janata Raja Bahuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Rameshwar Dilwale

¶2

62-WP-12047-24-11789-24-IA-13550-24.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

RAMESHWAR LAXMAN DILWALE

¶5

Digitally signed by RAMESHWAR LAXMAN DILWALE Date: 2024.10.16 10:54:31 +0530

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.12047 OF 2024

¶7

Bha	gvant Education Society, Barshi	}
Thr	ough its Secretary,	}
San	deep S/o Balaji Barade	}
Age	:34 years. Occ:Service	}
R/o	Alipur Road, Barshi	}
Tq.	Barshi Dist: Solapur. Vs.	}.. Petitioner
1.	The State of Maharashtra	}
	Through Chief Secretary,	}
	Department of School Education	}
	And Sports Ministry	}
	Mantralaya, Mumbai.	}
	(Copy to be served on G.P. High	}
	Court of Judicature of Bombay)	}
2.	The Department of Finance	}
	Through its Secretary,	}
	503, 5^thfloor, Mantralaya,	}
	Hutatma Rajguru chowk, Madam Kama	}
	Road, Mumbai 400032.	}
3.	State of Maharashtra Directorate	}
	of Primary Education, Dr Aani Bezant	}
	Road, Central Building, Pune. 411001	}
4.	The Education Officer Primary Zilla Parishad, Solapur	} }
	Siddheshwar Peth,	}
	Tq. & Dist. Solapur.	}. Respondents

¶8

WITH

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO.11789 OF 2024 WITH

¶10

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.13550 OF 2024

¶11

1/3

¶12

Rameshwar Dilwale

¶13

62-WP-12047-24-11789-24-IA-13550-24.doc

¶14

¶15

WRIT PETITION NO.11789 OF 2024

¶16

Janta Raja Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal & Ors. .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents

¶17

Mr. Dnyaneshwar B. Pokale i/by Mr. Vivek V. Kabade, Advocates for the petitioner in WP/12047/2024.

¶18

Mr. Dnyaneshwar B. Pokale, Advocate for the petitioner in WP/11789/2024 and Advocate for the applicant in IA/13550/2024.

¶19

Mr. B. V. Samant, Additional Government Pleader with Mrs. T. D. Goswami, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent-State.

¶20

CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ DATE : 10^th OCTOBER, 2024.

¶21

ORAL JUDGMENT : { Per A.S. Chandurkar, J. }

¶22

Leave granted to implead the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nashik as respondent no.5. The amendment be carried out forthwith.

¶23

RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶24

The petitioners are Educational Institutions seeking reimbursement of grants under the provisions of Section 12(2) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, previously part amount of the grant has been reimbursed and now the entitlement is for 25% of such further grant.

¶25

The learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions,

¶26

2/3

¶27

Rameshwar Dilwale

¶28

62-WP-12047-24-11789-24-IA-13550-24.doc

¶29

submits that the respondent no.3 is the Competent Authority to consider the entitlement of the petitioners.

¶30

In the aforesaid facts, the writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent nos.2 to 4 to consider the entitlement of the petitioners to reimbursement of grants under Section 12(2) of the Act of 2009. The respondent nos.4 and 5 shall furnish necessary information to the said Authorities, as required. The aforesaid process of considering the entitlement of the petitioners be undertaken and completed within a period of three months of receiving copy of this order. Needless to state that on such entitlement being found, further consequential steps shall be taken by the respondents.

¶31

Rule is disposed of in aforesaid terms with no order as to costs.

¶32

[ RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ]

¶33

[ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ]

¶34

3/3

Janata Raja Bahuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Throu. President Ganesh D Neel and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra Throu. Its Sec. Dept of School Education and Sports and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Janata Raja Bahuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Throu. President Ganesh D Neel and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra Throu. Its Sec. Dept of School Education and Sports and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shekhar K. Mahalaxmikar vs State of Maharashtra and Others

Ruturaj Surendra Kane vs State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary, Dept. of Medical Edu and Ors.

Rajgadh Sahakari Sakar Karkhan Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Rita Roy vs Union of India Thru the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Dept. of Revenue

Bhagvant Education Society Barshi vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Chief Secretary Dept. of School Education and Ors.

Sindhudurg Zilla Shikshan Sanstha Chalak Mandal , Pandur (Registered) vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary, School Edu. and Sports Dept. and Ors.