This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/2
902 - WP 12124 OF 2024.doc
Digitally signed by KANCHAN KANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2024.08.30 18:43:48 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 12124 OF 2024
Sindhudurg Zilla Shikshan Sanstha Chalak Mandal, Pandur
….. Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
….. Respondents
Mr. Prashant Bhavake for the Petitioner.
Mr. B. V. Samant, Addl. G.P a/w. Mr. S. P. Kamble, A.G.P. for the State – Respondent Nos. 1 to 6.
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ
DATE : 29th AUGUST, 2024
P.C. :-
One of the grounds of challenge as raised to Rule 9 (2C) of
the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 is that the communication of names of candidates by the Deputy Director or Education Officer in the proportion of 1 : 10 for one vacant post is restrictive in nature.
KVM
2/2
902 - WP 12124 OF 2024.doc
for the respondent nos. 1 to 6. The respondent no.7 be served
through all modes of service.
[ RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ]
[ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ]
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the communication of candidates' names in a 1:10 ratio under Rule 9(2C) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 is restrictive in nature.
Whether Rule 9(2C) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 is challenged in this writ petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sindhudurg Zilla Shikshan Sanstha Chalak Mandal, Pandur
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Chandurkar
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
