Amol Arvind Pawar v. Ms Dosti Corporation Vihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order: writ petition stood over for want of time, interim orders continued.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11710 OF 2024
Amol Arvind Pawar ....PETITIONER
V/S
Ms Dosti Corporation Vihar
....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B.P. COLABAWALLA & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ DATE : 12th December, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 30/01/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Amol Arvind Pawar
- respondent
Ms Dosti Corporation Vihar
Coram
B.P. Colabawalla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Ravindra Purushottam Birole (Huf) through Its Karta Ravindra P. Birole vs Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Pune Bench through Its Registrar
Naresh Jayaram Pujari and Ors. vs Addl District Judge Session Judge 8 Alias Chairman Shree Kalaram Sansthan and Ors.
1. Chiplun Sand Mining and Trading Corporation through Its Properietor Nishar Kadir Katmala vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Seok-Am Tech Company Also Known as Satco vs Tema India Limited