Preliminary hearing in a writ petition challenging the imposition of FSI instead of monetary compensation. The court issued notice to respondents and restrained coercive action until the next hearing date.
Interim stay on coercive action until 6 December 2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27-WP-11543-2024 AS.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11543 OF 2024
Purnima Talkies ...Petitioner Versus Chief Officer, Dhahanu Nagar Parishad and Ors. ...Respondents
Ms. Yogita i/b. Aafreen S. Shaikh, for the Petitioner. Ms. S.S. Bhende, AGP, for the Respondent No.3.
Digitally signed PALLAVIMAHENDRAWARGAONKAR by PALLAVIMAHENDRAWARGAONKARDate:2024.11.29 13:20:42 +0530
CORAM : G. S. KULKARNI & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ.
DATE : 22 NOVEMBER 2024
P.C.:
represented, the Court shall proceed to hear the petitioner and pass appropriate orders. The short issue which falls for consideration is whether by communication dated 23 July 2024 respondent No.1 can foist on the petitioner FSI and not monetary compensation, as according to the petitioner, this would be in the teeth of the decision of the Full Bench of
Page 1 of 2
Pallavi Wargaonkar, PS
27-WP-11543-2024 AS.doc
this Court in Shree Vinayak Builders and Developers, Nagpur vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.1 and followed by the subsequent decisions of this Court in WP(L)/9118/2024 ( Our Lady of Immaculate Conception Church
vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors .2).
the adjourned date of hearing.
[ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.]
- 2022(4) Mh.L.J. 739
- Writ Petition (L) No.9118 of 2024
Page 2 of 2
Pallavi Wargaonkar, PS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the authorities can mandate Farmed Settlement of Interest (FSI) instead of monetary compensation for land acquisition.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shree Vinayak Builders and Developers, Nagpur vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.Referred¶18
2022(4) Mh.L.J. 739 · Who else cites this
Purnima Talkies
Chief Officer, Dhahanu Nagar Parishad
Ors.
G. S. Kulkarni
Advait M. Sethna
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
