Disposed

M/S S.K Enterprises Throu. Its Partner and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC24 Sept 2024WP/12755/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging a CIDCO order/letter dated 11 July 2024 and any allotment of plot no. 178A at Sector 17, Ulwe, Navi Mumbai to respondent no. 6. As a civil suit over the same land was already pending, the High Court disposed of the petition permitting the petitioners to urge all contentions in that suit.

What the court decided

AI extract

M/S S.K Enterprises Throu. Its Partner and Ors. vs the State… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

4-WP-12755-2024 (C).DOC

¶2

KAWRE KIRAN KALYAN Digitally signed byKAWRE KIRANKALYAN Date: 2024.11.2517:02:31 +0530

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 12755 OF 2024

¶6

M-s. S.k Enterprises Thr. Its Partner And Ors. ...Petitioners Versus

¶7

The State Of Maharashtra And Ors.

¶8

...Respondents

¶9

Mr. Rishabh Shah i/b Dr. Suneet Gupta, for Petitioner.

¶10

Ms. S. D. Vyas Addl. G. P. a/w M. S. Bane AGP for State.

¶11

Mr. Rohit Sakhadeo for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 – CIDCO.

¶12

Mr. Atul Damle, Sr. Advocate i/b Vikram N. Walwalkar, for Respondent Nos.5A to 5E.

¶13

Mr. Y. S. Jahagirdar, Sr. Advocate a/w Mr. Suresh Sabrad, Amey Sawant, Neha Zanje, Pratik Sabrad, for Respondent No.6.

¶14

CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ.

¶15

DATE: 21 NOVEMBER 2024

¶16

P.C.

¶17

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed, praying for the following reliefs:

¶18

“A] rule be issued, record and proceedings be called for:

¶19

B] to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to quash and set aside the order/letter dated 11 July 2024 issued by Respondent no. 4 in respect of plot bearing no. 178A, admeasuring 800 square meters situated at Sector 17, Ulwe, Navi Mumbai:

¶20

C] this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct Respondent no. 4 to cancel the allotment in in respect of plot bearing no. 178A, admeasuring 800 square meters situated at Sector 17, Ulwe, Navi Mumbai to Respondent no. 6 if granted;

¶21

Page 1 of 3 21 November 2024

¶22

Kiran Kawre

¶23

4-WP-12755-2024 (C).DOC

¶24

D] this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the Respondents herein to maintain status quo in respect of plot bearing no. 178A, admeasuring 800 square meters situated at Sector 17, Ulwe, Navi Mumbai till final disposal of the said suit filed by the Petitioners in the Court of Learned Civil Judge [Senior Division] Panvel at Panvel;

¶25

E] Pending the hearing and final disposal of this Writ Petition, the Respondents be directed to maintain status quo in respect of plot bearing no. 178A, admeasuring 800 square meters situated at Sector 17, Ulwe, Navi Mumbai;

¶26

F] Pending the hearing and final disposal of this Writ Petition the Respondent nos. 1 to 4 and 7 be restrained from issuing any allotment letter and executing Agreement to Lease in favour of Respondent no. 6 in in respect of plot bearing no. 1781A,admeasuring 800 square meters situated at Sector 17, Ulwe, Navi Mumbai;

¶27

G] Pending the hearing and final disposal of this Writ Petition, the order/letter dated 11 July 2024 issued by Respondent no. 4 be stayed;

¶28

H] Pending the hearing and final disposal of this Writ Petition that if there is any Allotment letter is issued by Respondent nos. 1 to 4 and 7, the same be stayed;

¶29

I] Ad-interim and Interim Reliefs in terms of above prayer clauses [e]. [f], [g] and [h] be granted to the Petitioners;

¶30

J] Any other reliefs as may be deemed fit and proper as may please be granted in favour of the Petitioners herein.”

¶31

2. Reply affidavits are filed on behalf all the respondents.

¶32

Mr. Sakhadeo, learned counsel for CIDCO has also tendered his reply affidavit.

¶33

It appears to be an admitted position that there is a Civil Suit filed by the petitioners asserting its legal rights in respect of the land subject matter of the present proceedings as also subject matter of the allotment of alternate land by the CIDCO in favour of Respondent No.6.

¶34

Page 2 of 3 21 November 2024

¶35

Kiran Kawre

¶36

4-WP-12755-2024 (C).DOC

¶37

It is, hence, appropriate that the petitioners assert all contentions in the suit being Special Civil Suit No.200 of 2024 pending before the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division at Panvel.

¶38

We are also informed that the petitioners have filed an Interim Application in such suit which is pending adjudication as also the respondent No.6 has filed an application under Order 7 Rule XII of the Code of Civil Procedure which is also stated to be pending.

¶39

We accordingly dispose of this petition, permitting the petitioner to urge

¶40

all contentions in the pending suit including on clubbing of the pending Interim Applications.

¶41

All contention of the parties are expressly kept open.

¶42

Disposed of. No costs.

¶43

(ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.)

¶44

Page 3 of 3 21 November 2024

¶45

Kiran Kawre

M/S S.K Enterprises Throu. Its Partner and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

M/S S.K Enterprises Throu. Its Partner and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Thermax Limited Successor to Former Thermax Babcock vs National Faceless Assessment Centre

Thermax Limited Successor to Former Thermax Babcock vs National Faceless Assessment Centre

Udaan Builders and Developers vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department and Anr.

Vijay Baburao Mahajan and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra Thr Secretary and Ors.

Seok-Am Tech Company Also Known as Satco vs Tema India Limited

Pradnesh Samit Yadwad Thr Natural Guardian and Father Samit Shrishail Yadwad vs Union of India Thr Secretary and Ors.