Laxmibai Mangal Page v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim notice issued in a writ petition seeking adjudication of an application for re-grant of land under Section 36A(6) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, after earlier transfers were declared invalid. The order decides nothing on merits; it issues notice returnable on 26th September 2024 and directs filing of affidavit-in-reply.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.11460 OF 2024
Laxmibai Mangal Page .. Petitioner
Vs.
The District Collector, Mumbai
.. Respondent
Mr. Ranjit A. Thorat, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Pratibha Shelake and Mr. Ganesh Bhujbal, Advocates for the Petitioner.
Mrs. M.S. Srivastava, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ DATE : 29TH AUGUST, 2024.
P.C. :
- Pursuant to an order dated 8th February 2005 passed by the SubDivisional Officer, Mumbai, the application preferred by the present petitioner under Section 36A of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 came to be allowed. The transfer of land bearing Survey No.263, H. No.3 of Village Malad, Tal. Borivali in favour of Mr. Ram Kumar Mahton vide Agreement dated 22nd October 1991 and subsequent transfer in favour of M/s. Hari Shree Enterprises vide Deed of Conveyance dated 22nd October 1999 and any of the other further transfers came to be declared as invalid. It is informed that this order has now attained finality. The petitioner on 27th August 2019 has sought re-grant of the said land under Section 36A(6) of the Code. Since this application is not adjudicated, the petitioner has approached this Court.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Should the petitioner's application for re-grant of land under Section 36A(6) be adjudicated?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Laxmibai Mangal Page
- respondent
The District Collector, Mumbai
Coram
A.S. Chandurkar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court