Sunil Thampy Nair v. State of Maharashtra
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
907.WP.18019-2024.DOCX
Pradnya
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 18019 OF 2024 Sunil Thampy Nair …Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and ors. … Respondents
Adv Prasannan Namboodiri , a/w Adv Prathibha Namboodiri, Adv Tejal Darekar, Adv Pallavi Dabak, Adv Rishabh Sinha, for the Petitioner.
- Ms S. D. Vyas, Addl.G.P. , a/w Ms P. N. Diwan, AGP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ. DATED: 17 December 2024
PC:-
- The affidavit filed on the directions contained in our order dated 14 December 2024 does not comply with the direction in paragraph 3 in its entirety.
- Ms Vyas also submits that there are other deficiencies in the affidavit so filed.
- Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to file additional affidavit.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sunil Thampy Nair
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
M.S. Sonak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court