Disposed

Ch Robinson Worldwide Freight I Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra through Chief Secretary

Bombay HC2 May 2024WP/1139/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging Labour Court and Industrial Court orders in an unfair labour practice complaint, settled by consent terms between the company and union; the Court disposed of the petition in terms of the consent terms and quashed both impugned orders.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of in terms of Consent Terms; impugned orders dated 20.01.2023 and 23.10.2023 quashed and set aside; Complaint (ULP) No.108 of 2019 disposed of per Consent Terms.

Ch Robinson Worldwide Freight I Pvt. Ltd. vs… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

6-WP-1139-2024.DOC

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.1139 OF 2024

¶5

CH Robinson Worldwide Freight (I) Pvt. Ltd. …Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents

¶6

Mr. Harsh Moorjani a/w. Ms. Smruti Kanade, Advocates, i/b. Negandhi Shah & Himayatullah, for the Petitioner. Mr. Milind More, Addl. G.P., a/w. Mr. Suraj Gupte, AGP, for the Respondent No.1.

¶7

Mr. Vinod Shetty, Advocate, for the Respondent No.2.

¶8

Mr. Mayuresh Joshi, Senior Manager (HR) of the PetitionerCompany, present.

¶9

Mr. Sandeep Baba Kadam, Executive President, Maharashtra Nav Nirman C.H.A. Kamgar Sena, Respondent No.2-Union, present.

¶10

CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 12^th AUGUST 2024

¶11

P. C.:

¶12

By the present Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner is challenging the legality and validity of order dated 20^th January 2023 passed in Complaint (ULP) No.108 of 2019 by the learned Judge, 10^th Labour Court, Mumbai and order dated 23^rd October 2023 passed by the learned Member, Industrial Court, Mumbai in Revision Application (ULP) No.18 of 2023.

Page 1 of 3

Sonali

6-WP-1139-2024.DOC

Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.2 state that parties have settled the dispute and executed the Consent Terms. Both of them tendered the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are signed by Mr. Mayuresh Joshi, Senior Manager (HR) on behalf of the Petitioner-Company and by Mr. Sandeep Kadam, Executive President of the Respondent No.2-Union. The Consent Terms are also signed by the learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties. Both the learned Advocates identify the signature of the respective parties.

¶17

Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that Mr. Mayuresh Joshi, Senior Manager (HR) is authorized by the Petitioner-Company to execute the Consent Terms. The resolution of the Petitioner-Company is annexed to the Consent Terms. Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.2 states that Mr. Sandeep Kadam, Executive President is authorized by the Respondent No.2-Union to execute the Consent Terms.

¶18

Accordingly, the Consent Terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.

Page 2 of 3

Sonali

6-WP-1139-2024.DOC

A soft copy of the Consent Terms will be uploaded as the second order in the matter.

¶23

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms.

¶24

Resultantly, the impugned order dated 20^th January 2023 passed in Complaint (ULP) No.108 of 2019 by the learned Judge, 10^th Labour Court, Mumbai and order dated 23^rd October 2023 passed by the learned Member, Industrial Court, Mumbai in Revision Application (ULP) No.18 of 2023 are quashed and set aside and said Complaint (ULP) No.108 of 2019 is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms.

¶25

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]

¶26

Page 3 of 3

¶27

Sonali

Ch Robinson Worldwide Freight I Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra through Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ch Robinson Worldwide Freight I Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra through Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Indubai Pagare vs State Government of Maharashtra and 4 Ors.

Jerry Varghese International Ltd. vs Mathew Yohannan and Anr.

Jerry Varghese International Ltd. vs Mathew Yohannan and Anr.

Centrum Capital Limited vs Shriram Epc Limited

Cynthia Pinheiro vs the District Deputy Registrar

SBI General Insurasnce Company Limited vs Employees State Insurance Corporation