Indubai Pagare v. State Government of Maharashtra and 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Procedural adjournment order only: time granted to Respondent No. 2 to file affidavit-in-reply, matter stood over to 08.07.2024, with notice that the petition may be heard finally at the admission stage. Decides nothing of general application.
What the court decided
- WP 936-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 936 OF 2024
Indubai Pagare
.Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
.Respondents
Mr. V. S. Daware, Advocate, for the Petitioner Mr. Prashant Kamble, AGP, for Respondent No.1 – State Mr. Akshay P. Shinde, Advocate, for Respondent No. 2
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE: 26.06.2024
- P. C.
- Mr. Shinde, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No. 2
seeks time to file affidavit-in-reply. Let affidavit-in-reply be filed on or before 05.07.2024.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Indubai Pagare
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Madhav J. Jamdar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court