The Bombay High Court disposed of two writ petitions. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to challenge a separate judgment by the Small Causes Bench and dismissed the writs as not pressed.
Liberty to file a challenge against the impugned judgment of the Small Causes Bench was granted. Writ petitions dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27-WP-289-22 & 44-wp-1117-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.289 OF 2022 WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.1117 OF 2024
Central Silk Board … Petitioner V/s. Meghdoot Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. … Respondent
Ms. Anusha P. Amin, Advocate for the Petitioner in both.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 29 JANUARY 2024
P.C.:
1
Sharada
27-WP-289-22 & 44-wp-1117-24.doc
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
2
Sharada
Central Silk Board
Meghdoot Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
