Neelam Madhu Sharma v. Vishwanath Ramsaran Mehra (Deceased)
Bombay HCTP/5173/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Testamentary registry compliance call on a will petition; proposed caveators' advocate sought time to file a caveat and a copy of the petition. Registry directed notice to the petitioner's advocate and adjourned.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
SLG
¶2
BEFORE : MRS. R. V. RANE , COMPANY REGISTRAR / TESTAMENTARY REGISTRAR Date: 19th December, 2024
¶3
CALLED FOR COMPLIANCE :
¶4
- 234 TP/5173/2024 AMH20230044656C202400011
¶5
with
¶6
WILL/2066/2024
¶7
Advocate for petitioner and Petitioner are absent.
¶8
- PC : 1. Perused Petition. Today, in this matter one Advocate namely Aishwarya Jose i/b. Vishal Hegde appeared before me on behalf of proposed Caveators namely Shruti Kapur and Hema Kapur. She submits that she not known the relations of the said proposed Caveators with the deceased as well as legal heirs of the deceased and inspite of that, she requested time to file Caveat and also asked to serve the copy of petition to be served upon her.
¶9
- Office is directed to serve Notice upon the Advocate for petitioner to remain present on the next adjourned date. Ld. Advocate for proposed Caveator also communicate the next date to the Advocate for petitioner.
¶10
- List the matter on 03.01.2025 FOB.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner in WILL/2066/2024
- other
Shruti Kapur
- other
Hema Kapur
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court