Mr Sujit Nagin Patel v. Nagin Lakhu Patel
Bombay HCTP/2479/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Testamentary petition adjourned; petitioner's advocate to mention non-consenting legal heirs before the court.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| Before : Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date :- 12thNovember, 2024 |
||
|---|---|---|
| FOR COMPLIANCE: | ||
| 44. TP/2479/2024 [Original] (ECHCBM02039142024) |
P. C. : | Shri. Dhawal Visawadia Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner |
| 1. Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner submitted that he will mention the matter before Hon’ble court in respect of the non-consenting legal heirs. Hence, adjourned. |
||
| 2. S. O. 10.12.2024 | ||
| 12.11.2024 |
Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
Coram
AI extract
P. A. Jagdale
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Hansa City Bus Services Mumbai Pvt. Ltd. through director vs Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply Transport Undertaking (Best)
Mr. Siddaram Bhimsi Koli. vs Mr. Muktesh Ashok Kadam
Sucheta Desmond Rodrigues, Mumbai vs the Bombay Presidency Golf Club Limited Mumbai and Ors.
Mount Nirmala Co-Operative Housing Society Limited vs Bishop John Rodrigues and Another