Harsha Ramchandra Wadhwani v. Jitendra Bhagwandas Ahuja (Deceased)
Bombay HCTP/5141/2024
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
Before : Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date :- 18th November, 2024
¶2
FOR ISSUANCE OF CITATION :
¶3
- TP/5141/2024 P. C. : None for the Petitioner [Original] (ECHCBM02153602024) 1.
¶4
- Perused Petition. Issue Citation within two weeks from today. Issue Notice to the Collector vide Rules 396 of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules, 1980 (for short “BHC Rules”). Issue citation to the non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased, if any. Advocate is directed to take steps in this regard. Ld. Advocate for the petitioner to ensure that requisitions under Chapter XXVI of the BHC Rules are complied with.
¶5
- Advocate to take steps in respect of service of General Citation and also to affect the service upon non-consenting legal heirs, if any, as per Rules 399 and 400 of BHC Rules. In case non-consenting legal heirs, the petitioner shall justify the share of such heir/s. The petitioner shall furnish Administration Bond for the gross amount as per Rule 420 of the BHC Rules, within one week after that, if there are another legal heir/s other than the petitioner/s.
¶6
- Office to verify if any cross-petition is filed, if cross-petition is filed, then take steps to place before the Hon’ble Court under Rule 407 of the BHC Rules.
¶7
- S. O. to 06.01.2025
¶8
18.11.2024 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Petitioner
- respondent
Collector
- respondent
Non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court