Maher Sunil Padhiar v. Rita S. Padhiar (Deceased)
Case brief
What is this about?
Testamentary petition for issuance of citation. Directions given to issue citation and notice to the Collector, serve non-consenting legal heirs, comply with requisitions, furnish affidavit of service and administration bond, and verify any cross-petition.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Before : Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date :- 05th October 2024
FOR ISSUANCE OF CITATION :
- TP/4678/2024
P. C. : Ishri. Harshal Savla /b Mayur Vinod Faria(P),, Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner
- Perused Petition. Issue Citation within two weeks from today. Issue Notice to the Collector vide Rules 396 of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules, 1980 (for short “BHC Rules”). Issue citation to the non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased, if any. The advocate is directed to take steps. Ld. Advocate for the petitioner to ensure that requisitions under Chapter XXVI of the BHC Rules are complied with.
- Advocate to file an affidavit of Service of General Citation and also effect service upon non-consenting legal heirs, if any as per Rules 399 and 400 of BHC Rules and also justify the surety of non-consenting legal heirs, if any, and furnish Administration Bond for the gross amount as per Rule 420 of the BHC Rules, within one week after that.
- Office to verify if any cross-petition is filed, if cross-petition is filed, then take steps to place before the Hon’ble Court under Rule 407 of the Bombay High Court O. S. Rules.
- S. O. to 25.11.2024
05th October 2024 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mayur Vinod Faria
Coram
P. A. Jagdale
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court