Allowed

Sunita Sanjeev Jangam v. Pushpa Chandrashekhar Naik (Deceased)

Bombay HC17 Feb 2024TP/409/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition by the deceased's daughter seeking Letters of Administration for properties left by her mother. With no contest, heirs consenting by affidavits, and citation and notice periods expired, the court granted Letters of Administration subject to verification of no caveat and filing of accounts and administration bond.

What did the court decide?

Letters of Administration granted to the petitioner for scheduled properties, subject to office verification and filing of account and administration bond.

Sunita Sanjeev Jangam vs Pushpa Chandrashekhar… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 38.TP/409/2024

¶2

Before: Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date 05th April 2024

¶3

FOR COMPLIANCE:

¶4

TP/409/2024 P. C. Shri. Glenn Mendonca Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner :

¶5

This is a petition for the grant of Letters of Administration, under the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short “IS Act”) for the properties left by the deceased, namely Pushpa Chandrashekhar Naik w/o late Chandrashekhar Naik(For short “Said deceased”). The petitioner, namely Sunita Sanjeev Jangam w/o Sanjeev Jangam, hasfiled documents such as a true copy of the death certificate of the deceased, identity proof of the deceased, and oath in the prescribed format.

¶6

I have heard Ld. Advocate and peruse the petition along with the documents.

¶7

Said deceased died on 15-09-2016 at Mumbai leaving behind her legal heirs, shown in paragraph No. 4 of the petition. Petitioner states that there are no other legal heirs to the deceased, except heirs shown in the petition. Deceased left properties are shown in the schedule. The delay has been explained vide Rule 382 of the Rules.

¶8

Citation was issued, which has been duly affixed on the conspicuous part of the Hon’ble High Court and notice board of the Collector’s Office at Mumbai and 14 days have expired vide Rule 397(1) and (4) of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules, 1980(for short “BHC Rules”) and an affidavit to that effect has been filed. Notice to the collector has been issued vide Rule 396 of BHC Rules. Till today, no one appeared to resist the claim of the petitioner or nothing has been brought to the notice regarding pending litigation about the same properties. Hence, the petition is treated as an uncontested one.

¶9

2 38.TP/409/2024

¶10

Legal heirs of the deceased have consented by way of Affidavits to grant the prayer of the petitioner to grant a Letters of Administration, without reserving any right. They have accepted the facts, regarding their relationship, interse.

¶11

1. Petitioner has filed the administration Bond in prescribed form No. 118 with surety.

¶12

Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submitted that in view of provisions of Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the petitioner, being daughter of the deceased, is entitled to seek a Letters of Administration. Hence, facts stated by the petitioner and heir of the deceased, on oath, remained unchallenged and required to be accepted. Accordingly, the petition deserves to be allowed, as prayed for. Hence, the following order:

¶13

ORDER

¶14

1. Petition is allowed and the Letters of Administration be granted to the petitioner for properties, left by the deceased and shown in the schedule, in the prescribed format as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925

¶15

1. Before issuance of the grant, the office to verify that there is no cross Petition pending or caveat resisting the petition is filed.

¶16

1. The petitioner is to file an account as undertaken in a Petitioner’s Oath within the stipulated period. Office to verify that an Administration Bond is properly executed and uploaded.

¶17

05th April 2024

¶18

Officer on Special Duty,

¶19

with Testamentary Department

Sunita Sanjeev Jangam v. Pushpa Chandrashekhar Naik (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunita Sanjeev Jangam v. Pushpa Chandrashekhar Naik (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Anjan Mahendra Asher vs Mahendra Laxmidas Asher Mahendra Laxmidas Ashar Asher Laxmidas Mahendra Mahendrakumar Laxmidas

Alpa Dipen Vadodaria vs Deceased Lata Pravin Mehta

Ronak Narendra Kotecha vs Veena Narendra Kotecha (Deceased)

Shantha Vithalrao Lakshmain and Shreedhar Vithalrao Nayak vs Vithalrao Dasappa Lakshmain (Deceased)

Sushila Sharma vs Bal Krishna Sharma (Deceased)

Parimal Indravadan Dalal vs Smita Indravadan Dalal (Deceased)