Allowed

Sushila Sharma v. Bal Krishna Sharma (Deceased)

Bombay HC9 Jul 2024TP/405/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Uncontested petition by the widow for Letters of Administration under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for properties left by her deceased husband. Citation was duly issued, heirs consented by affidavit, and an administration bond was filed. Petition allowed as prayed.

What did the court decide?

Letters of Administration granted to the petitioner over the deceased's scheduled properties, subject to filing account and office verification before issuance.

Sushila Sharma vs Bal Krishna Sharma (Deceased) — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 30.TP/405/2024

¶2

Before :Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date 07th October, 2024

¶3

FOR COMPLIANCE:

¶4

TP/405/2024 P. C. Shri. Darshit Rupda i/b MDP & Partners Ld. Advocate for the : Petitioner

¶5

1. This is a petition for grant of Letters of Administration, under the Provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short “IS Act”) for the properties left by the deceased, namely Balkrishna Shital Sharma (For short “Said deceased”). The petitioner, namely Sushila Balkrishna Sharma, has filed documents.

¶6

I have heard Ld. Advocate. I perused the documents, such as true copy of the death certificate of the deceased, identity proof of the deceased, oath in the prescribed format, affidavit of service citation.

¶7

Said deceased died as a Married on 02/10/2020 at Gurgaon, Haryana leaving behind him legal heirs, shown in the paragraph No. 4 of the petition. Petitioner states that there are no other legal heirs to the deceased, except heirs shown in the petition. Deceased left properties shown in the schedule.

¶8

Citation was issued, which has been duly affixed on the conspicuous part of the Hon’ble High Court and notice board of the Collector’s Office at Mumbai and 14 days have been expired vide Rule 397(1) and (4) of the Bombay High Court(O.S.) Rules, 1980(for short “BHC Rules”) and an affidavit to that effect has been filed. Notice to collector has been issued vide Rule 396 of BHC Rules. Till today, no one appeared to resist the claim of the petitioner or nothing is brought to the notice regarding pending litigation pertaining to the same properties. Hence, the petition is treated as uncontested one.

¶9

2 30.TP/405/2024

¶10

Legal heirs of the deceased have consented by way of Affidavits to grant prayer of petitioner to grant a Letters of Administration, without reserving any right. They have accepted the facts, regarding their relationship, inter-se.

¶11

Petitioner has filed the administration Bond in prescribed form No. 118 with surety.

¶12

Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submitted that in view of provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the petitioner, being Widow of the deceased, is entitled to seek a Letters of Administration. Hence, facts stated by petitioner and heirs of the deceased, on oath, remained unchallenged and required to be accepted. Accordingly, petition deserves to be allowed, as prayed for. Hence, following order:

¶13

ORDER

¶14

1. Petition is allowed and the Letters of Administration be granted to the petitioner for properties, left by the deceased and shown in the schedule, in prescribed format as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

¶15

1. The petitioner to file an account as under taken in a Petitioner’s Oath within stipulated period.

¶16

1. Before issuance of the grant, the office to verify that there is no cross Petition is pending or caveat resisting the petition is filed.

¶17

07th October, 2024 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department

Sushila Sharma v. Bal Krishna Sharma (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushila Sharma v. Bal Krishna Sharma (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Adi Keki Motafram vs Ardeshir Jijibhai Divecha (Deceased)

Shabnam Rizwan Ali vs Rizwanali Afsarali Alias Rizwan Afsar Ali(Deceased)

Kanchan Ashok Kajrolkar vs Ashok Pandharinath Kajrolkar

Saeedabano Meheboob Jamadar vs Bilkish Meheboob Jamadar

Mukesh Dhanjibhai Daftery vs Indumati Dhanjibhai Daftery (Deceased)

Veena Virendra Devgan vs Virender Haridas Devgan