Allowed

Arnaz Zhooben Bhiwandiwala v. Tehmi Homi Kanga

Bombay HC28 Aug 2024TP/1441/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Testamentary petition for limited Letters of Administration with Will annexed by the executor's constituted attorney. Attesting witness proved execution and sound mind; heirs and legatees consented; administration bond executed.

What did the court decide?

Limited Letters of Administration with Will annexed granted to petitioner until probate is applied for, subject to administration bond and verification of no caveat/cross petition.

Arnaz Zhooben Bhiwandiwala vs Tehmi Homi Kanga — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

BEFORE : MR. DILIP S. GURAV, FIRST ASSISTANT MASTER Date: 4^th October, 2024

¶2

CALLED FOR COMPLIANCE :

34 TP/1441/2024 ) )

) P.C.: )

)

)

)

)

)

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

¶11

Ms. Kanchan Pamnani, Advocate for petitioner

¶12

1. Perused Petition. Heard Ld. Advocate for petitioner. This petition is fled by i Arnaz Zhooben Bhiwandiwala , being Constituted Attorney of Firdaus Homi Kanga being Sole Executor named in the Will. Will was executed by Tehmi Homi Kanga (herein after the same is referred to as Testatrix”). Testatrix said to have died on 29th February, 2020 at Mumbai. Petitioner f i led the copy of death certif i cate (which is annexed to petition as Exhibit-A ), identity proof of the testatrix (which is annexed to petition as Exhibit- B ), Will, petitioner's oath, af fi davits of legal heirs of the testatrix and petitioner’s af fi davit.

¶13

2. Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that as mentioned in para No. 9 of the petition by petitioner that Firdaus Homi Kanga was Executor under the Will.

¶14

Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submits that this petition was earlier f i led by Arnaz Zhooben Bhiwandiwala. She has carried out necessary amendment in petition on 3 rd August, 2024 and prayed for as follows:

¶15

“That Letters of Administration with the said Will annexed may be granted to him, having ef f ect in the State of Maharashtra for the use and benef i t of the said Firdaus Homi Kanga as such Executor as aforesaid and limited until he shall obtain Probate of the said Will from this hon’ble Court reserving the right of the sole Executor to apply for probate ”.

¶16

Said Executor had executed Power of Attorney dated 27th October, 2018 in favour of Arnaz Zhooben Bhiwandiwala. Copy of Power of Attorney has been annexed to the petition as Exhibit – “F”. Said Firdaus Homi Kanga has appointed Arnaz Zhooben Bhiwandiwala to be his Constituted Attorney

…….2

CONTD….

34 TP/1441/2024 )

– 2 –

for him and in his name and on his behalf to apply for and obtain a grant of Letters of Administration with Will.

¶22

3. The petitioner has explained the delay in para 11 of the petition as per Rule 382 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rule, 1980(for short “Rules”).

¶23

4. Petitioner stated that the testatrix left behind her last Will and Testament which was duly executed at Mumbai on 2 nd February, 1990 in English language. Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that the original Will is handed in separately for being f i led and kept in a safe place in the Ofce of the Prothonotary and Senior Master, High fi Court, Bombay.

¶24

5 . Petitioner states that parents and husband of testatrix were predeceased to her and testatrix was survived by legal heirs shown in the paragraph No. 8 of the petition, as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 as applicable to Parsi . Testatrix died leaving behind two daughters namely Arnaz Bhiwandiwala – Constituted Attorney of the petitioner herein, Mahroukh Piloo Shrof and only son namely Firdaus Homi Kanga. Consent Afdavits of Mahroukh Piloo Shrof fi f dated 2 nd December, 2023 and Arnaz Zhooben Bhiwandiwala dated 20 th September, 2024 are on record. They have given their consents in form of Afdavits, which are f fi i led on the record by Constituted Attorney of the petitioner and consented for the issuance of Letters of Administration with Will annexed in favour of the petitioner without justifying any surety in respect of their shares in the estate of the testatrix. They have waived the service of Citation. The petitioner afrmed that there are fi no other legal heirs of the testatrix other than mentioned in para 9 of the petition.

¶25

6. Afdavit of Service of General Citation is f fi led, i stating that citation has been af fi xed on the Notice Board of the Hon’ble High Court, Bombay and notice board of the Collector’s ofce on fi 27.05.2024. Notice to collector has been sent. …. 3

¶26

CONTD…

¶27

– 3 –

¶28

7. The petitioner has f i led the afdavit of fi Shernaz Faram Dastur, one of Attesting Witness to the Will, in the Form No.102 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. Attesting witness deposed that she was present and testatrix signed on the Testament papers in presence of her and another witness. According to her, all additions and alteration, in a Will, were existed at the time of execution and before signing the Will. Hence, there is sufcient compliance of the Rule 383 of the fi Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 . Attesting witness further deposed that at the time of execution of the Will, testatrix was of sound and disposing mind, memory and understanding. Hence, enough evidence is on record to accept the execution of the Will and petitioner is succeeded to prove the execution of Will.

¶29

8. Other legatees who are not legal heirs of testatrix have consented vide their Afdavits to grant Letters of fi Administration with Will to the petitioner. Consent Afdavit of Cyrus Pirojshaw Shrof fi f dated 06.11.2023 and Sorab P. Shrof f dated 13.11.2023 are on record. They have waived the service of Citation. They stated on oath that they have received all the bequest to them under Will. They have given their free consent without justifying surety of their shares.

¶30

9. Properties mentioned in the schedule of the petition are referred in the Will as well as in residuals clause of the Will. Ld. Advocate for petitioner submitted that as mentioned in para 7 of the petition which reads as under:

¶31

“That the petitioner has truly set forth in Schedule No. I, hereto annexed and marked Exhibit “E”, all the property and credits which the deceased died possessed of or entitled to at the time of her death, which have or are likely to come to her hands”.

¶32

The Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submitted that properties available to the testat ri x at the time of her death are mentioned in the Schedule-I of the petition.

.....4

CONTD…

– 4 –

34 TP/1441/2024 )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

¶38

As per Will para No. 6, testatrix has bequeathed property mentioned in Schedule I of the petition to her son namely Firdaus Homi Kanga absolutely and exclusively.

¶39

10. Petitioner has executed the Administration Bond dated 11.06.2024, in the prescribed format. Hence, following order:

¶40

ORDER

¶41

1) Petition is granted.

¶42

2) Ofce to issue fi LIMITED Letters of Administration with Will annexed as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to the petitioner, till original Petitioner come and apply for Probate later on and upon satisfaction that the Administration Bond is properly executed, as per the Rules.

¶43

3) Before issuance of above said Letters of Administration with Will, the ofce to verify that there is fi no cross Petition is pending or caveat is f i led. Ofce to fi act accordingly.

¶44

04.10.2024 FIRST ASSISTANT MASTER

Arnaz Zhooben Bhiwandiwala v. Tehmi Homi Kanga

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arnaz Zhooben Bhiwandiwala v. Tehmi Homi Kanga

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sushila Sharma vs Bal Krishna Sharma (Deceased)

Shamim Mohammad Shafi Shaikh vs Farzana Noel Soans (Deceased)

Shrinivas Pannalal Shivhare vs Pannalal Ramlal Shivhare (Deceased)

Punam Narayan Bhatia vs Vindribai Parshotamdas Alias Vindribai Parshotamdas Bhatia (Deceased)

Rajeshwari Gangaram Bale vs Gangaram Gangayya Bale

Vijay Kisan Mungse and Anr. vs Chandrabhaga Kisan Mungse (Deceased)