Allowed

Uday Shantaram Pashte v. Rajaram Savji Pashte Alias Rajaram Savji Paste Alias Rajaram S. Paste

Bombay HC6 Apr 2024TP/1093/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Uncontested petition for Letters of Administration under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for the estate of a deceased who died in Mumbai in April 2023. Citation was duly affixed with no objections; legal heirs consented by affidavits and an administration bond was filed. The court allowed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Letters of Administration granted to the petitioner over scheduled properties, subject to verification of no caveat/cross-petition.

Uday Shantaram Pashte vs Rajaram Savji Pashte… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 40.TP/1093/2024

¶2

Before :Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date 12th July, 2024

¶3

FOR COMPLIANCE:

¶4

TP/1093/2024 P. C. Shri. Sudhir Yadav Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner :

¶5

[Original] (ECHCBM0222062 2023)

¶6

This is a petition for grant of Letters of Administration, under the Provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short “IS Act”) for the properties left by the deceased, namely Rajaram Savji Pashte alias Rajaram Savji Paste alias Rajaram S. Paste (For short “Said deceased”). The petitioner, namely Uday Shantaram Pashte, has filed documents such as true copy of the death certificate of the deceased, identity proof of the deceased, oath in the prescribed format, affidavit of service citation.

¶7

I have heard Ld. Advocate and perused the petition along with the documents. Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submitted that citation is affixed on 03.06.2024 and affidavit of service is also filed by Sheriff and administration bond online having document no. EDHCBM02383212024. 3) Said deceased died Married on 19/04/2023 at Mumbai leaving behind him legal heirs, shown in the paragraph No. 4 of the petition. Petitioner states that there are no other legal heirs to the deceased, except heirs shown in the petition. Deceased left properties shown in the schedule.

¶8

Citation was issued, which has been duly affixed on the conspicuous part of the Hon’ble High Court and notice board of the Collector’s Office at Mumbai and 14 days have been expired vide Rule 397(1) and (4) of the Bombay High Court(O.S.) Rules, 1980(for short “BHC Rules”) and an affidavit to that effect has been filed. Notice to collector has been issued vide Rule 396 of BHC Rules. Till today, no one appeared to resist the claim of the petitioner or nothing is brought to the notice regarding pending litigation pertaining to the same properties. Hence, the petition is

¶9

2 40.TP/1093/2024

¶10

treated as uncontested one.

¶11

Legal heirs of the deceased have consented by way of Affidavits to grant prayer of petitioner to grant a Letters of Administration, without reserving any right. They have accepted the facts, regarding their relationship, inter-se.

¶12

1. Petitioner has filed the administration Bond in prescribed form No. 118 with surety.

¶13

Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submitted that in view of provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the petitioner, being Nephew of the deceased, is entitled to seek a Letters of Administration. Hence, facts stated by petitioner and heirs of the deceased, on oath, remained unchallenged and required to be accepted. Accordingly, petition deserves to be allowed, as prayed for. Hence, following order:

¶14

ORDER

¶15

1) Petition is allowed and the Letters of Administration be granted to the petitioner for properties, left by the deceased and shown in the schedule, in prescribed format as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

¶16

2) Before issuance of the grant, the office to verify that there is no cross Petition is pending or caveat resisting the petition is filed.

¶17

3) The petitioner to file an account as under taken in a Petitioner’s Oath within stipulated period.

¶18

12^th July, 2024 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department

Uday Shantaram Pashte v. Rajaram Savji Pashte Alias Rajaram Savji Paste Alias Rajaram S. Paste

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uday Shantaram Pashte v. Rajaram Savji Pashte Alias Rajaram Savji Paste Alias Rajaram S. Paste

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Pradeep Ganpat Sankhe vs Deepak Ganpat Sankhe(Deceased)

Chanchal Singh W/o Sher Amarjit Singh vs Sher Amarjit Singh (Deceased)

Sunita Sanjeev Jangam vs Pushpa Chandrashekhar Naik (Deceased)

Pushpalata Mohan Bhoir vs Mohan Mahadev Bhoir

Yashodhara Yogendra Soman Nee Varsha Madhusudan Oak vs Anita Madhusudan Oak (Deceased)

Uday Shantaram Pashte vs Rajaram Savji Pashte Alias Rajaram Savji Paste Alias Rajaram S. Paste