A second appeal was withdrawn upon filing of consent papers and a letter instructing withdrawal. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the appeal along with a pending interim application.
The Second Appeal was allowed to be withdrawn; the pending interim application stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2 42sa 195.23.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Second Appeal No. 195 of 2023 With Interim Application No.2251 of 2023
In
Second Appeal No. 195 of 2023
Gourishankar Manik Gadhave & ors. ... Appellants v/s. … Urmila Suryakant Mirge Respondents
Mr Mahesh V. Rawool i/b. Avinash B. Avhad, for the appellants.
Digitally signed by LATA LATA SUNIL SUNIL PANJWANI PANJWANI Date: 2024.02.26 10:53:11 +0530
P.C. :
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE : 23 February 2024
The learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that the parties have amicably resolved the disputes amongst them and that Consent Purshis have been filed before the Executing Court. A copy of the letter dated 23rd February 2024 addressed by the appellant’s instructing the Advocate to withdraw the appeal is tendered. Copy of the letter alongwith copy of the consent purshis are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.
2/2 42sa 195.23.docx
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Lata Panjwani, P.S.
Gourishankar Manik Gadhave & ors.
Urmila Suryakant Mirge
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court