Allowed condonation of a 26-day delay in filing a second appeal. The application was directed to be listed high on the board.
Condonation of delay of 26 days in filing appeal; application disposed of; appeal listed for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by GANESH GANESH SUBHASH SUBHASH LOKHANDE LOKHANDE Date: 2024.02.23 18:58:28 +0530
Ganesh Lokhande, PA 1/1 14-IA-15865-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 15865 OF 2023 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 6644 OF 2023
Sachin Vitthal Adagale .. Applicant vs. Anant Jaysingrao Khilare .. Respondent
Mr. Shubham R. Dhenge, a/w. Akash M. Murudkar, i/b. Ashish Pawar, for the Applicant.
Mr. D. M. Gupte, for the Respondent.
CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 23rd FEBRUARY, 2024.
P. C.:
1. The Interim Application is filed seeking condonation of delay of 26 days in filing the Appeal. The Application is opposed by Mr. Gupte, the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent.
2. Considering the length of delay as well as the explanation is given in the Application, I am of the view that the delay deserves to be condoned.
3. Accordingly, the Interim Application is allowed. Delay in filing the Appeal is condoned.
4. Interim Application is disposed of accordingly.
5. List the Appeal ‘High on Board’ on 26th February, 2024.
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay for 26 days in filing a second appeal is justified.
Sachin Vitthal Adagale
Anant Jaysingrao Khilare
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
